Monday, June 23, 2008

A Clouded Worldview

NY Times Editorial

Ok, so, wow. This is a pretty slanted editorial.

"Evolution...is a theory rigorously supported by abundant evidence."

We all share the same evidence. The difference is not in the clarity of the evidence, but the clarity of the glasses through which one views the evidence. The foundational truths of Genesis can give us 20/20 vision in interpreting the evidence.

"The religious faith underlying creationism..." -- what about the religious faith underlying evolution? Both models require faith in things that no one has directly witnessed.

The biblical flood of Noah offers us a perfectly reasonable explanation for the fossils found around the world, and explains why fossilized remains of creatures we see extant in the world today look EXACTLY the same (e.g. The coelacanth, the Wollemi pine, et. al.). That's a very difficult nut for the evolutionist to crack.

There is no macroevolution.

Period.

In other words, the lack of proof for macroevolution is evidence of macroevolutions faulty premise. It is not simply proof that we haven't found the proof yet!

In the beginning, GOD created. . .